Matt Badham for downthetubes: Before taking on Captain
Britain and MI-13 for Marvel Comics , were you actually a fan of the
character?
Paul Cornell: Oh, yes, enormously. I had every collection that had ever been
released up to that point, which wasn't many. One of my earliest comics memories
was that one Christmas my parents got me a Captain
Britain annual, which had the origin story and some Gil Kane Captain Marvel
in the back if I remember correctly. (I may be recalling that wrong). And I've
loved him since then.
|
Captain Britain Weekly #1 -
cover by Herb Trimpe |
I think that the very earliest Captain
Britain stories
are some of [artist] Herb Trimpe's best comics work. There's something really
involved and exciting about his art on the title. And I don't think that Chris
Claremont does a bad job at all with the story. I was also obviously a fan
of the Alan Moore Fury stuff, but Jamie Delano as well, you know, all the different
approaches... and Dave Thorpe, who I think is sadly neglected.
downtheutbes: Everyone seems to focus on the Alan Moore stuff.
Paul: Alan Moore and Alan Davis do loom hugely over the title. So much so that
the only thing to do when I took over was to move it out of their sphere of
influence, because a character that is being influenced by previous versions
to an undue degree is not a living character.
I tried to do what I think Ed
Brubaker has done spectacularly on Captain America,
which is to find what would work for the character now and move it out of the
shadow of previous interpretations.
|
Captain Britain written by
Dave Thorpe - recoloured for a US collection. |
downthetubes: I think you've answered my next three questions without me having to ask them. I was going to ask how you felt about filling big shoes by following creators like Claremont, Davis and Moore, who have all previously handled the character.
Paul: I am not. I am simply not filling those big shoes. I am making my own shoes.
downthetubes: Your Captain Britain has undergone a dramatic re-birth and reinvention. Please tell us about that.
Paul: Let's go into the details. For a start, the [Alan] Davis costume is a lovely piece of comic art. It's a brilliant piece of design. But I think that it says to people, Excalibur. To be precise, whimsical, fluffy, jolly, lovely, warming, heartfelt Excalibur.
I'm enjoying the classic Excalibur collections
and, indeed, read the comic when I was younger, but I do think it is from a
previous era of comics, where a whimsical, 'We're all in this together gang'
feeling was the norm. These days we have a smaller audience and a much more
focussed comic shop audience. This is the move from the whole world getting
comics in their newsagents to fans getting comics from comic shops. Comics
are much more action-oriented. I wanted to change the costume.
|
Captain Britain and MI13 #1 |
There'd been
a halfway house, leaving the old costume, but putting pouches around the belt,
which had been developed by various other artists. But I wanted it to be the
new creative team that defined the character now, rather than being in the
shadow of previous creators.
Also, I didn't want readers to be reminded of
Excalibur all the time. And because [MI-13 artist] Leonard [Kirk] does wonderful
facial expressions, I wanted it to be a costume where we could see all the
‘acting'. And Cap's mask really limited what... even the eye sockets were blank.
You need that costume to be drawn in a slightly cartoony way to express enough
emotion out of it. If you think of a standard Alan Davis-shot of Cap's face
when he's surprised, it's quite cartoony because that's the way to get the
emotion. With Leonard Kirk's more photo-realistic art, you don't get the emotion
that Leonard is capable of if Cap is masked.
downthetubes: Because the features are obscured?
Paul: Absolutely.
downthetubes: You mentioned that you're aware, as a writer, of the audience being more exclusive/fannish.
Paul: Yeah. And this is true of all comics I think. Would Justice
League International, Bwah Hah Hah, would that sell nowadays? I don't think so. The warm bath Excalibur with lots of in-jokes and appearances by staff members and reaching out to the fans every single moment; I think that's a wonderful way to run a comic book but I don't think it would sell today. I think most comic creators do write with this in mind, but some of them consciously and some of them unconsciously. Myself, I'd like to be on the newsstands. We're not and that's nobody's fault. It's just the way the world is now.
|
Captain Britain and MI13 #2 |
downthetubes: When I was reading the comic, I got a sense that it was a post-Ultimates book. Do you agree?
Paul: In that I've read Ultimates and it's somewhere in the mix. The
Ultimates is very well written and it delights in its bullishness. It delights in pushing boundaries.
downthetubes: The Hulk eating people...
Paul: I think that we are one notch less ruthless and when Pete Wisdom wants to be ruthless it's to come as a stark reminder and it's set against an effort to bring heroism back into the book, which is brought in by Cap, who is magically created.
He is Marvel's Captain Marvel. Cap was picked because he is the
best of British folk against Pete, who tries his damnedest to make sure that
everyone survives and to be good, but feels that, and I think this was best
summed up in the anime Samurai Seven, 'You must
be prepared to take upon you the sin of killing.' Pete feels that he is the
one who has to take onto his conscience doing the nasty stuff.
I wanted for
Cap and Pete to be friends, because in the past they've always played out this
conflict through a series of huge dramatic arguments, and I wanted this conflict
played out with the two of them trying to understand what the other has to
do.
It could be said that Pete has co-opted Cap into his world. Cap
is actually more pure and more pristine than that. Pete's doing his best. He's
not lying to anybody. He's trying to put these big iconic British superheroes
into an intelligence setting and it's working so far, but there are tensions
and that's where we get the meat of the conflict.
downthetubes: The character of Captain Britain does actually refer to those tensions
in the book, when he talks about the fact that he's killing Skrulls because
the Earth is at war with the Skrull Empire, but after the war he won't carry
on killing. It strikes me that this is a theme in a lot of your writing, right
back to your work with the Doctor Who New Adventures range of novels for Virgin
Publishing – the plight of the morally upright person who is finally forced
into a position where they have no alternative but to do bad things to save
the day.
Paul: Absolutely, because loving Doctor Who and that being the centre of my writing world, you learn more and more that the thing to do is to put your characters through the biggest emotional hell possible. If you've got the Doctor who is, from a certain angle, that morally upright person, you have to do that to him. That's where the drama is. That's where you're going to naturally go. The gravity of writing takes you there.
The same is true for Captain Britain, who in the old series was
almost ridiculously upstanding. That was one of the things that, again, Excalibur kind of gravitated to, because he was an upstanding hero and because he had
to be drawn in a cartoony way to express emotion, then he becomes a bit of
a buffoon almost automatically. I wanted to get the buffoonery out of him.
And to do that, he's got to be a little more accepting of stark realities while
remaining the hero. So we've got those lovely grating edges and some nice friction
there.
downthetubes: He's a reluctant soldier.
|
Captain Britain and MI13 #5 |
Paul: I wouldn't say reluctant. Reluctant during the Skrull War. He's, I think, certain that Pete won't ask him to do anything that he wouldn't want to do. And if Pete did ask him, then Brian could just refuse.
That's where we are at the moment. Brian might find out certain
things that Pete does to clear up round the edges of what happens and that's
going to be interesting. I'm trying not to spoil the end of my current arc.
downthetubes: Just to segue off into something that's related. How much fun are you having writing Pete Wisdom?
Paul: Tremendous fun. Pete is my Mary-Sue.
downthetubes: That's a fan fiction term isn't it?
Paul: Yeah. A Mary-Sue is a character who's there to represent the author. Having said that, they all are to some extent.
downthetubes: They're different facets of you?
Paul: Absolutely. I think that's the best way to write a team book. One of my favourite things in comics is the moment when a character's behaviour just writes itself. You gain an insight into an old, established character; often it happens with writers for Batman... that's what I like. I like to give my characters those moments.
Pete has been neglected in recent years. He's a little bit of
a fallow field to play with. He's such an everyman, but he's got this big burden
of guilt that he deals with in an almost unique way, by keeping on moving into
the future and not being defined by that guilt. But he also always makes sure
that nobody else has to do the bad stuff. That it's always him. He's sort of
the negative version of Peter Parker. If Peter suddenly thought that the way
to do things was to just to shoot the Green Goblin.
Again, the desire to create
a pristine, shiny team of superheroes; I think that Pete would love to do that.
It's his aspiration as opposed to where he always ends up.
downthetubes: Again, it's the fundamentally good man who is forced by circumstances to do some bad things for the greater good.
Paul: As a socialist, I'm an interventionist. It's all been completely
twisted round in modern politics... It used to be the Right that wanted to
stay at home and the Left that wanted to, you know, help the Spanish. Pete
also represents my desire to get on with the future and not be held back by
the past. On a national level.
One of my complaints about Britain is how it's
always looking backwards. It's still defined by one world cup and two world
wars. To which the German football fans might justifiably reply, 'Sorry, what!?!'
downthetubes: And do you get irritated by things like the scapegoating of youth?
Paul: Very much so.
downthetubes: The interesting thing about the book is that on one level it's about well-choreographed superhero slugfests, but on another it's quite issue-based and quite politically-chraged.
|
The Black Knight and new heroine
Fasia Hussain on the cover of Captain Britain and MI13 #7 |
Paul: Absolutely. Giving Fasia Excalibur was really important to me.
downthetubes: This is Fasia Hussain, the character of the young Muslim doctor.
Paul: Because what it represents is unconditional acceptance. If you can draw Excalibur, then you are British. And strangely enough, that hasn't been controversial in the slightest, which I'm quite pleased about.
downthetubes: Do you think that shows that people are generally more sensible than they're usually given credit for?
Paul: I always think that, given the chance, they can be. Anyway, what I try and do is what all the best superhero books do. I try and write modern Greek and Roman myths that actually reflect things that are going on right now. Much as every body of mythology talks about what is happening right now, in terms of when it was created. The
Ultimates did this very well. And everything that Stan Lee ever did was literally just about looking out of his window. His Marvel comic body of work, which is all about New York, is just extraordinary. The fact that Peter Parker still, all these decades later, represents to us something iconic about being a certain age.
downthetubes: It resonates, doesn't it?
Paul: It does. That's what we're after. That feeling of things resonating. That's why I wanted to have a superhero team that have a different relationship with officialdom than they do in the United States. We could have, over here, a superhero team that was officially sponsored and accepted, but were not regarded as slightly priggish as they are in America post-The Initiative and all that. You don't have to be a rebel over here to be cool necessarily.
I also wanted a team that was part of the whole military structure
and the political structure. Apart from anything else it's really cool to have
a bunch of heroes on a mission with a bunch of soldiers helping them. It's
Jon Pertwee Doctor Who really.
downthetubes: I wanted to go back to the issue of cultural identity. Fasia Hussain is interesting character in her own right, but her inclusion in the comic, to me, says something specific about Britishness.
Paul: I think so. You've got people from all different aspects of Britain in
there. People assume that Brian's nobility, but he's not. He's got some inherited
wealth that was acquired during his superhero run. It's Jaq that's nobility
and her voice... well, I'd like her to speak rather more ‘40s than she can,
because her speech habits will have changed during that long life of hers.
And when you're young again you find your speech habits being knocked back
and forth. That's where our speech habits evolve anyway, so I assume that when
she became young again there was a huge in-flux of modern vernacular. And also
there's something that feels wrong about a character being too Lady Penelope
[the posh secret agent from the 1960s puppet adventure series, Thunderbirds]
in modern comics, so I've had to try and rein that back. So we've got her from
the nobility, we've got Fasia from the Pakistani community.
This is the other
awkward thing that I wish we didn't have in Britain: we don't have Italian-American,
we don't have Pakistani-British. We still call such folk Pakistanis, which
doesn't work and says a lot about us. She is a Pakistani-Brit. We have Dane,
who's an American, but he's been over here so long... and I think Eric is kind
of like that too, in that I don't believe he has any British speech habits
left. I think that he's entirely American. And of course, Pete, who is what
you might call working class. His family are from Wiltshire, but I think that
he's lived in London for a long time. I always think that he talks a little
like Michael Caine. This is why I always have him pointing. Michael Caine points
at things. It's a kind of stew.
downthetubes: Like society.
Paul: Yeah, and I do recall... I love Knights of Pendragon,
but one of the things that I disliked about it was that they were forever having
people point at Captain Britain and go,"‘You're a fascist, wearing the flag etc,
etc.' And he would have to patiently explain that he wasn't and that he represented
all that was best about Britain, yadda, yadda. This is sub-text.
downthetubes: But there has been, certainly in my childhood and up until fairly recently (I'm 35), a big nervousness about the Union Flag because of its appropriation by the Far Right.
Paul: I think it's changing a little. Thanks to football, we are actually flying the flag a bit more.
downthetubes: Do you think that's healthy?
Paul: Yes, it is.
downthetubes: What's your take on the potentially blurred line between patriotism, nationalism and racism?
Paul: I think that only the English feel uncomfortable about patriotism.
downthetubes: Do you think we're bad at assimilation, basically?
Paul: Yeah, exactly. When you've got assimilation, patriotism actually becomes something wonderful.
downthetubes: Because people belong?
Paul: Yes, absolutely. It not only makes people belong, it allows them to belong. Over here we have never asked immigrant populations to embrace the flag and we sometimes get out the flag and use it to beat them with. I think that if we started to embrace the flag, we could perhaps ask them nicely to as well. It's one of those things that is rooted so deeply in us that it may never happen.
downthetubes: Do you think this is part of being an island nation?
Paul: I think so. The Japanese have almost exactly the same problem. I always equate Japan and Britain hugely.
I think that we are very similar peoples actually. In all the
good ways as well as some of the bad ways. I think the more we hide the flag
away the more we're going to be scared of it. We've got to get it out there
and show it. For a start, it implicitly references immigration. That first
integrated flag with the various different crosses on it. I would never have
a Cap costume that didn't have the flag on it.
downthetubes: Do you feel sometimes, certainly, an awareness of your politics... that we've been discussing... do you feel they're a bit misunderstood?
Paul: I'm very easily misunderstood because I'm a bit of a mix.
downthetubes: Aren't most people?
Paul: Yes, especially, in the last decade, where things have been turned round
to such a degree. I'm New Labour and I think that a lot of people who claim
to be old Labour, it's kind of like, 'What have the Romans done for us?' You
know, apart from the minimum wage and the Bank of England and all these things
are things that Labour would heartily agree with. It's almost a fetish saying
there's a difference between the two. It's a meaningless bit of in-fighting.
I think the Third Way economically, to say there are certain
things that private enterprise does really well and there are certain things
that should only be run by central government, is the only sane plan.
Old-fashioned
socialism, that is to say everything should be nationalised, doesn't work and
letting the free market loose doesn't work. I'm very much what you'd call a
moderate, in those terms.
downthetubes: And presumably, for you, New Labour got that balance right?
Paul: Yeah, absolutely.
downthetubes: What was this about Conservative leader David Cameron in Captain
Britain and MI13?
Paul: I was really sorry I couldn't put him in.
downthetubes: Did the lawyers get on to you?
Paul: I was going to treat him nicely. Basically, he was going to be meeting
with Dracula, who was going to say, 'If you do this small thing for me, then
I will use my influence in Britain to get you elected.' And we'd have Cameron
going to him, 'Yes, yes, I will think about your proposal. That sounds great.'
And then going home and immediately calling MI-13. But the lawyers said that
even for a couple of pages the hint that a real figure might be doing something
bad wasn't allowable.
The only way that we could have Gordon Brown in there
[in an early issue] was that he was being thoroughly heroic. That applies to
the use of all real figures in Marvel really.

downthetubes: Are you slightly disappointed?
Paul: Yeah. But, you know, it's nobody's fault. It's just the way things are.
downthetubes: How important has Leonard Kirk been to the book's success?
Paul: Hugely. Three people run the book really. Me, Leonard and Nick Lowe, the Editor. We have these demented plotting sessions and conversations. It's a great way to do things, because we can change things between us. Not like a TV show where you've got layer upon layer of people to check stuff with. Nick has really been a powerful force in terms of plotting, in terms of shaping where we're going. And that's great. We form a plotting unit.
Leonard is a great artist; he's got fantastic, what they call
acting in comics, he can create terrific drama through expressions. It means
that I can pull back from descriptive dialogue. He will re-plot a page if he
has something better in mind and we now know each other well enough that I
can just let him because his version is always better.
When I had a Blade versus
Spitfire fight scene page to write, I thought that there was no point at all
in me writing a silent fight scene for the page, so I just asked Leonard to
have them fight. He knew what both characters wanted and he knew where they
were going to end up, and then the next page is back on script. What I said
to him was, 'You choreograph that.' What he provided was a page composed of
16 panels. Now I would never have given an artist that, because that would
be seen as insanely demanding, but it's a great scene! And this is the level
of trust that's developed between us. It's lovely.
|
Captain Britain and MI13 #12 |
downthetubes: Are you, Leonard and Nick starting to get that 'musicians in a
band' feel?
Paul: What Nick does is, I throw all the ideas at him, including the bad ones, and he cherry-picks. It's like I've got a safety net. So when I suggest Dracula on the Moon, he says, ‘Great!' It's lovely. I can really go to the edge imaginatively, but he's there to catch me if I fall over.
downthetubes: How much fun are you having the superhero slugfests? Although, you mentioned that you're deferring on those more and more to Leonard.
Paul: Well, only in terms of the actual dynamics. I love superhero fight scenes. I love X-Men-style fight scenes where it's about cooperation. It's about doing them in terms of emotional content.
The next issue that I've got to write, I'm thinking it might
be very nearly silent because we've got some huge emotional trauma going on
but I think it can almost all be put over without speech. The trouble is that
will make it read fast and I want it to read slow, so it might be a case of
some long, low, flat panels that will slow the reader down. It's going to be
interesting, the next one.
downthetubes: You scripted quite a lot of comics before Captain
Britain and MI-13, but I get the impression that writing this book has taught, and is teaching you, some new tricks.
Paul: I think I'm still learning about comic book scriptwriting, but you don't
ever stop. I learnt a lot on Xtinct [a
theological dinosaur strip for the Judge Dredd Megazine;
as bonkers as it sounds! - Ed], because I gave D'Israeli some insane page descriptions. I was up to
10 panels a page on some of that and he managed to do everything I asked in
a really cool way, but comparing script to panels I found myself thinking that
I could have asked him to achieve the effects he achieved in better ways.
I've
been really lucky with people I've worked with. I really liked the work of
Mark Brooks on that issue of Young Avengers Presents I did.
downthetubes: Do you prefer photo-realistic art or cartoony art? Or is it kind of an apples and oranges question?
Paul: It is, yeah. I will try and write to suit whatever is there. And more cartoony isn't seen as good these days, but I think that kind of comic art can actually be much more emotionally expressive. Like Scott Pilgrim. The storytelling in that is over the moon. It's horses for courses really.
|
Dracula and Doctor Doom feature
on this interior page from Captain Britain and MI13 #10 |
downthetubes: Which other heroes are going to guest in Captain
Britain and MI-13? This special is out in February/March and with that in mind, what's next for Cap and MI-13?
Paul: We're talking about the Dracula arc, which is six issues, beginning with issue 10. It's tied into Dark Reign, the next Marvel event. I'm not sure if it's going to be a crossover or just accept the new status quo. Dracula has put the forces together to take Britain over either overtly or covertly. It's about trying to be in charge of the night, as it were, the supernatural beings that were let loose by Pete. And his first step toward this creates diplomatic problems, and it should be noted that he has a castle on the Moon now, because it's very hard to launch a military action against anything on the Moon without annoying lots of other countries. His first action is to come straight at MI-13 and attack them all in ways about which they are weakest.
The first issue of the arc is hopefully like... it's an espionage
game. It's Dracula versus Pete for six issues with a lot of the pawns getting
hurt.
downthetubes: And lots of action?
Paul: Yeah, yeah. We'll be going into Spitfire's central problem about her family. We'll learn about the Black Knight's curse. We should have the ebony blades in the first issue of this. And by the end of it, we'll have put the team through Hell and Pete will have faced his inner demons yet again, as well as his external demons.
downthetubes: I got the feeling, reading it, that the gloves are off. A fairly major character died early on in the series... well, major to me. He died and I cared.
Paul: There are two more traumatic things coming up relatively soon. Hopefully by the end of it, the team will have really bonded. We've got a whole bunch of supernatural super-villains coming up, working with Dracula.
Also, I wanted to do Dracula well. He is a military leader and
he's going to make a really good military attack. He's a major European leader
and he is, to a large degree, a racist.
He hasn't ever really got past from
when he was fighting off the Muslim hordes in Serbia. Britain under him would
be rather a different place...
• Captain Brtain and MI13 is now available in collected form
via all good comic shops and online retailers
• For more on Paul and his work, please visit www.paulcornell.com